Docker images 60% smaller: multi-stage builds in practice

#docker#tooling

A practical walkthrough from a 1.2GB image to a 460MB one without changing app code.

I kept a log of every decision during this project, and reading it back a month later was humbling: the choices that aged well were the boring ones, and the clever ones all came with a footnote I hadn't written yet.

Setting the scene

The numbers below are from my own machine and my own workload. Treat them as a method, not a benchmark: the point is how the measurement was taken, not the exact figures it produced.

The first version worked, which is exactly why it was hard to see how wrong it was. Everything looked fine in the demo, and everything looked fine until traffic arrived on a Tuesday afternoon and the graph started doing something I'd never seen before.

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_orders_created_at
    ON orders (created_at DESC)
    WHERE status = 'open';

The naive approach

I want to be honest about the trade-offs here. The approach I settled on solves the problem I had, not every problem of this shape, and there is a clear point where you should reach for something more heavy-duty.

By the end of this post you should be able to reproduce the whole thing yourself in under an hour, including the parts I got wrong the first time — those are marked so you can skip them if you're in a hurry.

A note for context that helps the reader.

What the profiler said

I kept a log of every decision during this project, and reading it back a month later was humbling: the choices that aged well were the boring ones, and the clever ones all came with a footnote I hadn't written yet.

What surprised me most was how small the final change was. Most of the work was understanding the problem precisely enough that the fix became obvious, and that understanding took far longer than the fix itself.

  • Latency at p50, because most users live there
  • Latency at p99, because someone always lives there
  • Error rate, because a fast failure is still a failure
  • Saturation, because averages hide the cliff

The rewrite

By the end of this post you should be able to reproduce the whole thing yourself in under an hour, including the parts I got wrong the first time — those are marked so you can skip them if you're in a hurry.

Tools matter less than the feedback loop they enable. A fast, boring loop beat every sophisticated setup I tried, and I've kept it ever since, even as the rest of the stack changed twice over.

The numbers below are from my own machine and my own workload. Treat them as a method, not a benchmark: the point is how the measurement was taken, not the exact figures it produced.